Political corruption in the United States, Germany and Russia

0

The US government shaped the governments of Germany and Russia; and, therefore, campaign finance laws in these three countries will be compared here.

The U.S. government shaped the German government not only because the U.S. government (with the cooperation of its WWII allies) shaped post-war West Germany, but because this western government German then also ruled the former East Germany after October 3, 1990; therefore the gift The German government is an extension of what the administration of US President Truman had product like to be Government of West Germany.

The US government also shaped the Russian government because the CIA and US economists controlled the Russian government during the presidency of Russian President Boris Yeltsin from May 30, 1990 to December 31, 1999, as has been well documented by numerous articles, such that “How Harvard lost Russia”, “Boris Yeltsin had an entourage of” hundreds “of CIA agents who taught him how to run Russia, says the former speaker of parliament”, “The plot to kill l ‘Soviet Union’, and, more recently, ‘Putin says Russian government was crawling with CIA officers’. (This was the result of decisions made by US President GHW Bush.)

So how do these three governments today compare with regard to campaign finance, which is an extremely important determinant of a country’s degree of corruption? After all: only if billionaires (& / or their corporations and nonprofits or ‘NGOs’) purchase the head of state of a nation and its legislators is legally very difficult to do, can the given nation itself may be to be a genuine democracy. For example: American billionaire George Soros commissioned a study to examine the votes of the 751 members of the European Parliament in order to compile a list of all those who (as the study became the title) “Trusted Allies in the European Parliament ( 2014 – 2019) ”, and exactly 30%, 226 of them, were listed as such. So: the likelihood that the EU actually represents the peoples of Europe seems to be quite low.

Below you will find answers that are firmly rooted in the written laws of each of these three countries (although not necessarily reflecting how these laws are forced – or not), concerning the 12 most obviously important questions which were studied. I present these dozen questions in the order that I believe provides the clearest order for the reader to interpret them, not in the order that was employed by the source:

GERMANY

“8. Is there a ban on anonymous donations to candidates? “There are no explicit provisions regarding donations to candidates.”

“2. Is there a ban on donations of foreign interests to candidates?” “There are no explicit provisions regarding donations to candidates.”

“18. Is there a limit to the amount a donor can give to a candidate? “There are no explicit provisions regarding donations to candidates.”

“Ten. Is there a ban on donations from companies with government contracts to applicants?” “There are no explicit provisions regarding donations to applicants.”

“4. Is there a ban on corporate donations to candidates?” “There are no explicit provisions regarding donations to candidates.”

“6. Is there a ban on union donations to candidates?” “There are no explicit provisions regarding donations to candidates.”

“5. Is there a ban on union donations to political parties? ” “There is [is] not explicit… ban on union donations to political parties ”

“3. Is there a ban on corporate donations to political parties? “” Prohibition of donation by legal persons, but accepted if it is a commercial enterprise in which the shares are more than 50% owned by Germans … “

“9. Is there a ban on donations from companies with government contracts to political parties?” ” “No.”

“14. Is there a limit to the amount a donor can give to a political party during a non-election period?” ” “No.”

“16. Is there a limit to the amount a donor can donate to a political party during an election? ” “No.”

“27. Are there any provisions requiring donations to go through the banking system? ” “No.”

RUSSIA

“8. Is there a ban on anonymous donations to candidates? “No.”

“2. Is there a ban on donations of foreign interests to candidates?” “” Yes. The ban applies to Russian legal persons with foreign participation, or state participation, or Russian legal persons registered less than one year before the payment of the donation.

“18. Is there a limit to the amount a donor can give to a candidate? “Yes, both for natural and legal persons”: currently (presidential) $ 110,000 / individual and $ 1,100,000 / company; & (legislative) $ 8,200 / individual & $ 38,500 / company.

“Ten. Is there a ban on donations from companies with government contracts to applicants?” “No.” [But there is this broader ban on corporate donations:]

“4. Is there a ban on corporate donations to candidates?” ” “Yes.”

“6. Is there a ban on union donations to candidates?” “No information found in sources.”

“5. Is there a ban on union donations to political parties? ” “No.”

“3. Is there a ban on corporate donations to political parties? ” “Yes.”

“9. Is there a ban on donations from companies with government contracts to political parties?” “” No “(except for corporate donations in general).

“14. Is there a limit to the amount a donor can give to a political party during a non-election period?” »« Yes »(same limit as in political competitions).

“16. Is there a limit to the amount a donor can donate to a political party during an election? »« Yes »(same limit as in political competitions).

“27. Are there any provisions requiring donations to go through the banking system? ” ” Donations[…]election funds are made through a post office or a bank in person by their own means on presentation of a passport or equivalent identity document,[…] [and with the person’s] taxpayer number [no corporation’s taxpayer number, because corporate donations are banned]. “

we

“8. Is there a ban on anonymous donations to candidates? “Yes.”

“2. Is there a ban on donations of foreign interests to candidates?” ” “Yes.”

“18. Is there a limit to the amount a donor can give to a candidate? “” Yes, for individuals [not for corporations or labor unions]. “

“Ten. Is there a ban on donations from companies with government contracts to applicants?” “Yes.”

“4. Is there a ban on corporate donations to candidates?” “Businesses and unions cannot make direct contributions to parties and federal candidates, but they can make contributions through a PAC, subject to limitations. “

“6. Is there a ban on union donations to candidates?” ” “Yes.”

“5. Is there a ban on union donations to political parties? ” “Yes.”

“3. Is there a ban on corporate donations to political parties? “Businesses and unions cannot make direct contributions to parties and federal candidates, but they can make contributions through a PAC, subject to limitations. “

“9. Is there a ban on donations from companies with government contracts to political parties?” “” Yes, for natural persons. “

“14. Is there a limit to the amount a donor can give to a political party during a non-election period?” “” Yes, for natural persons. “

“16. Is there a limit to the amount a donor can donate to a political party during an election? “” Yes, for natural persons. “

“27. Are there any provisions requiring donations to go through the banking system? ” “Yes.”

The United States does not display a clear “No” (or equivalents, such as “No information found in sources”).

Russia shows 5.

Germany has 11.

Although this is a very incomplete indicator of a country’s corruption, it presents the United States in a very favorable light and presents Germany (11 out of 12 “No”) as rather surprisingly corrupt. . Russia is halfway between the two, perhaps because after Yeltsin’s abominable reign, Putin cleaned up the Russian government, but much of that work remains to be done, even after 21 years.

The German government has been shaped more by Truman than perhaps any other in the world except the United States’ own government. But, according to the current indicator, America’s vassal nations appear to be even more Following corrupt that the imperial center, the United States itself, is – at least to the extent that its political campaign finance laws (“What is written in black and white” in law books) are concerned.


Source link

Share.

About Author

Comments are closed.